|
|
Bible 203: David and 2 Samuel 11:1-17 For those visiting for first time > welcome! We’ve been “studying” the books of 1st and 2nd Samuel through the summer We’ve watched the Children of Israel as they moved from gov’t by judges to govt’ by kings We’ve learned from their mistakes along the way [hopefully!] And we’ve learned from their successes, too! Two weeks ago we learned the importance of getting “back to the Bible”
The
After 20 years of neglecting the
David brought it to
And then last week, when David wanted to build a We learned the importance of paying attention to God Between last Sunday and this Sunday, time has passed (represented by 3-1/2 chapters) These chapters are either exciting or gruesome, depending on your interpretation of war If we were to make a movie of these stories > have to cast different actors Two weeks ago King David resembled dancer Gene Kelly or John Trivolta In these intervening chapters, David is more Arnold Schwartzenegger > The Terminator Whosh > 22,000 Aramean soldiers killed Whosh > seven hundred chariot teams dead Whosh > forty thousand horsemen slaughtered Sandwiched in between stories of war > one gentle story of a crippled man He was Mephibosheth, son of Jonathan, David’s soulmate and Saul’s son And he was only one of Saul’s descendents still around Couldn’t earn living because of his crippled condition So King David ordered that he would always eat at David’s table Very gracious act on David’s part The image of David portrayed in these chapters is an image of perfection Whatever he does, he does well He and his household prosper And then we come to Chapter 11 > Read 2 Samuel 11 INTERPRETATIONS
OF THESE VERSES This is a
difficult story for us, no matter how you look at it People have viewed this story from every possible angle over the years > tried to soften its impact Some scapegoat Bathsheba > she had her eye on David > he was her victim > all her fault Others rationalize his action > 1958 movie > Uriah was abusive husband > David rescued her Still others romanticize the whole thing > David fell in love with her from a distance The text does not support any of these views We must read this story
carefully and literally (without above biases) to find what it does say
David
made three serious mistakes
First > You’ve heard phrase “Keep the main thing the main thing”? David apparently had not heard it Or, at least, if he had heard it he didn’t do it It was the time of year when kings led their people in battle > probably spring The “main thing” in spring was for kings to lead their men to war But this year David stayed home He didn’t keep the main thing the main thing And that was his first mistake Second > David took what did not belong to him He knew Bathsheba was somebody else’s wife And he knew God intended each person to respect what belonged to another David had been faithful and generous in the past But this time he took what belonged to another And that was his second mistake Third > David tried to cover up his first and second mistakes He called Uriah back from battle and gave him a short vacation David didn’t count on fact that Uriah was honorable Not about to go enjoy comforts of home when other soldiers were at war Two wrongs don’t make a right > that’s the third thing to remember And that was his third mistake By now it was out of hand > innocent people died in raid intended as death trap for Uriah Re-read verse 27 WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM DAVID’S MISTAKESSeems to me that this whole situation can be compressed into a target-practice allegory Imagine this target is life > your life, my life And we are “aiming” for the best possible life The center of the target would represent God > paying attention to God The next ring
on the target represent the Our best interests and others’ best interests Shalom” the Israelites called it health and wholeness The outermost ring represents our selfish interests Whatever gives us pleasure at the expense of someone else In David’s case > “lust” It could be any number of things You name it, we’re likely to do it > selfish interests are part of “life” So, if this target was your life And if your aim was to get pleasure at the expense of another It would be fairly easy > big area > top, bottom, both sides But > You could miss the target altogether and hurt innocent bystander However, if your aim was to be as close to God and/or God’s realm It would take practice > lots of practice > regular > frequent practice We have target practice right here every Sunday
|
|
To navigate through the web site, click on the buttons at the top or on the side of the pages or on any links within the page. Use your browser's Back button to return to the previous page if that page does not appear in the buttons available. External hyperlinks should open in a new window - close it to return to this page. |